You are hereCreate Content / Kidnap mayhem abounds...
Kidnap mayhem abounds...
As if by design, the disbelief or refusal of society to believe was washed away by this week’s headlines. The shocking horror stories and dehumanising experience of kidnap victims made even the most unpatriotic Trini cringe in disgust at the sad state of our beloved nation. Many refused to accept the harsh reality of what these unfortunate victims and their families have been forced to undergo; society flippantly shrugged off this entire kidnapping phenomenon.
The image of babies crawling around in the blood of their murdered grandparents reminded us of the extent of the criminal evil that has infiltrated our beloved soca paradise. Many sought refuge in the fact that the nation’s Police Service remained a tangible and visible reminder of the existence of law and order in our society.
But whatever comfort one derived from the latter was dashed to pieces by the mafia-style execution of a brave kidnap victim who dared to testify against his abductors. His murder compelled us to remember the impotence of our lethargic, ineffective criminal justice system and the inability of the State to protect even the most vulnerable and exposed targets.
This latest execution of yet another State witness has made a mockery of the Government’s idle boast of having a grip on the crime situation. The irrational choices of who would be kidnap victims, it had made no sense to me, suddenly started making sense. I received calls from no fewer than five of the victims who had told me their stories. They called to remind me of how wrong I was to encourage them to stand up and co-operate with the police in securing the arrest and conviction of their kidnappers.
Mr X, who was taken to the forest in Blanchiseusse and pistol-whipped until he literally peed his pants, is forced to live with a different kind of pain. His severe personal injuries are the least of his concerns. His bank and credit cards were taken and he was forced to disclose his pin number after a kick that broke two of his ribs.
As one man made his way to the nearest ATM machine to calmly withdraw the maximum permissible daily limit from X’s accounts, another one telephoned Mr X’s daughters on their cellphones and remained silent when they said answered. Mr X was interrogated, while being tortured, about whether he had any security alarm systems in his house, any rapid response service with any private security firm, what kind of people his neighbours were, what kind of jewelry these families owned and where they kept them, whether he, Mr X, had a safe at home and the amount of money his family had in their bank accounts.
The kidnappers used Mr X’s cellphone to lure his two worried daughters back to their home where they were brutally raped by two men.
A walking bullseye
Two suspects have been arrested and charged but now Mr X is terrified and no longer wishes to testify against them because he feels as if he is a walking bullseye. Mr X intends to publicly indicate his refusal to testify at the next hearing of the case because he is convinced that police officers were involved in his abduction and that no one in authority has ever paid heed to his pleas.
Mr X’s confidence in the Police Service deteriorated even more rapidly when he was reduced to begging officers from the Arima Police Station to investigate clear leads. Up to now, the police are yet to secure the relevant video footage from the bank’s security cameras to ascertain the identity of the person who made the withdrawal from his account on the night Mr X was kidnapped.
No one has bothered to investigate the numbers the kidnappers had dialled from Mr X’s cellphone on that fateful night. And no one from the Police Service has ever had the courtesy to inform him, the main witness, about the dates for the court case against two of his abductors; he had to learn from a friend that the matter had twice been adjourned in his absence.
Why was Mr X never informed about the date of his court matter? He is, after all, the main State witness. Is this another example of bungling incompetence on the part of the police? Or is it a deliberate conspiracy to pervert the course of justice and ensure that the accused walk free?
How can Mr X forget the fearless boast of the man who broke his ribs that he was a police officer “with connections all around?”
Ms S, another kidnap victim called to remind me about our conversation concerning her failure to positively identify a man she clearly remembered as one of her kidnappers and rapists at an official police ID parade. Her family had received several threatening phone calls the day before the ID parade and the police had offered no protection.
Would it have been right for her to risk the lives of her loved ones who had just sacrificed their entire life’s savings to secure her release? Innocent casualties in the noble pursuit of justice was a price she could not bear. She therefore let one of her attackers walk and actually received an anonymous “thank you” call with the caller telling her she was “a good girl” and had “done the right thing” by choosing to protect her family.
Mr B, a quarry operator, struggled with his kidnappers, but was beaten into submission by men who told him they were policemen and soldiers.
He was taken to the forest in Tabaquite, bound and gagged and left there because his struggle had foiled the timing of the kidnappers’ plan.
They had planned to capture and transport him in the darkness of the early morning, but they found themselves facing the breaking dawn as Mr B struggled with them. B was able to free himself and stagger around for miles until he found help. He thought he was being clever by marking the spot where he was left by the kidnappers who planned to return for him that night, but the police never even bothered to keep the area under surveillance.
Like most of the kidnap victims I talked to, foreign-used car dealer Mr Y, has applied to the Commissioner of Police for a firearm user’s license. The Commissioner of Police has sat on these applications for several months now without no decision forthcoming. In the cases where the COP has given a decision, he has decided against giving a license.
How serious are we about cracking the backbone of this pernicious kidnapping ring when victims-cum-witnesses are left without any form of police protection, are not placed in a witness protection programme or police safe house, and are then incredibly denied a gun license to protect and defend themselves?
The kidnapped victims who have told me their stories have no confidence in the Police Service. Once the victims were freed, the standard and quality of the continuing investigation left a lot to be desired and, invariably, it has been the families of these victims and not the police, who remain the driving force behind subsequent investigations.
Once a victim is released, the police, in effect, operate as if the case is closed.
Police involvement
Police involvement in kidnappings is no longer considered a product of an overactive imagination prone to conspiracy theories. There are several police and army officers before the courts on charges of kidnapping. Rumours abound about a particular senior police officer who is said to be the mastermind of the kidnapping ring in Trinidad and Tobago.
One kidnap victim who has migrated said he had received a visit from one of the Prime Minister’s special advisors on National Security because he (the victim) had evidence that certain senior police officers were involved in his kidnapping.
To this official, he said he indicated his willingness to return to T&T to testify if he could be given the guarantee that his family would be relocated, given new identities and placed in a secure witness protection programme abroad. He was told that his evidence was critical and arrangements would be made for him and his family to return; nothing has even happened since then and to date, a low-level, Special Reserve police officer is the only one to have been charged in this kidnapping.
Mr D says he’s living proof of the impotence of the Police Service in dealing with kidnapping. He was kidnapped twice. The second time around, he was kidnapped to “teach him a lesson” because he was co-operating with the police in their investigations.
One honest, eager beaver police officer had attempted to conduct a serious police investigation into Mr D’s kidnapping and Mr D paid the ultimate price. No ransom demand was made the second time around he was kidnapped; Mr D was simply taken to a shack where he was tortured, sodomised and then released with a warning.
Another kidnap victim. Ms C, was raped, but did not have the courage to say so. She said Jade was her heroine, because Sollis remains the only case where the kidnap victim had the courage to publically admit that she was not just kidnapped, but tortured and raped.
Most victims continue to suffer in silence. Ms C said the way she was treated and handled by the police after her release added to her trauma after the harrowing ordeal of abduction and captivity.
“I felt like I was an object in a museum with numerous officers trying to catch a glimpse. I wanted to grieve, recover and be immediately reunited with my family. However, I had to first be subjected to the mauvaise langue microscope,” she said.
If the Army and Police Service are part of the kidnapping problem, it is difficult to see how they can be part the solution unless the criminal elements are first removed.
The evidence of involvement on the part of police and army officers in kidnapping cases is overwhelming. Young Uttamdeo Maharaj was murdered in Palo Seco when he foiled an attempt to kidnap his sister. The gun that was used in his killing turned out to be an official police gun that had been logged at the Arima Police Station. To date, no one has explained how a police gun found itself into the hands of kidnappers at the opposite end of the island in Palo Seco, so that they could murder Maharaj.
In the midst of all the current mayhem, grief and bloodshed, Prime Minister Patrick Manning says he needs one more year to bring crime under control and the Commissioner of Police says he is mobilising all his resources and troops to take crime-fighting to a higher level because Carnival 2007 is under threat.
“No one will interfere with our mas!”
Alas, if only Carnival was all year round.
- 1214 reads
What this commentary spells (along with those in previous weeks) is a total loss of Executive control over crime. Law enforcement agencies appear incompetent to say the least.
It is apparent to most reasonable people that there is a failure of accountability at an Executive level. One has to wonder why the Executive is so sluggish to act on corrupt elements the Police and Army. What purpose does it serve? Oppression of one group of people is the effect of this blindess to the apparent corruption in law enforcement. Is oppression a desired effect or side-effect?
"Oppression of one group of people is the effect of this blindess to the apparent corruption in law enforcement. Is oppression a desired effect or side-effect"?
It is no doubt there appears to be "corrupt elements in the Police and Army". But is the use of the word "Oppression" to create a desired effect or side effect? It seems to border on sensationalism and could bring to the fold bias thinkers. If that is so, a free thinker will be an outcast as what happens in every political party.
Anand is a man much to be admired for his strong stand against crime. He has taken a path many fear to venture or wished they had the testicular fortitude to go.
We could go on to debate what is "sensationalism" but that would lead down another alley.
In the context of the serious violent crime is there no objective evidence for oppression that seems to affect one group of people substantially more than another? Serious violent crime would include things like rapes, violent sexual assaults and kidnappings. The 'effect' (how it 'affects') groups depends on their cultures, family life and serious social and personal sequelae. From a scientific point of view there is probably no hard evidence because such evidence is not findable. [And BTW wouldn't it be in a government's interest to have someone find such evidence and make it very public - in the spirit of real openness?]
However, what happens when we have no science; no evidence? Do we just say there is no evidence so it does not exist and that we cannot comment or make reasonable inferences? I don't believe many of us will agree with that.
What we see in Anand's articles is most probably the tip of the iceberg - simply because Anand is brave enough to make the 'tip' visible. For every story Anand tells in the newspapers there could be 5 others like it that are untold. Who knows for certain?
Speaking with friends and relatives in Trinidad gives one a real perspective on what is going on and who are the people most affected from the social, cultural, family, business and personal perspectives. It's not open to pure science. However, there are some statistics emerging that shed some light e.g. http://www.guardian.co.uk/print/0,,329698195-103681,00.html
Behind closed doors and in telephone lines people are saying that one group is affected more. However, out in the open like here on the internet "yuh cyah say dat". As dey say "Yuh have tuh bat in yuh crease!"
My aunt was brutally murdered about 3 years ago. She was kidnapped by a man known to her and her children. It was reported but they treated it as a missing person so that they could do nothing until she was missing for 24hours. It didn't take that long as within 8 hours she was discovered dead; she was killed just hours after she was taken. The children identified their mother's killer, even provided a picture, were taken to his residence but still no arrest was ever made...even up to this day.
Her children's lives were in danger. He threatened to kill all 3 of them. At one point he followed my cousin in Port of Spain. She was smart and walked to the police station but the maniac waited brash-facedly outside for her to come out. She told them that the man who killed her mother was outside the station, that he was following her around, if they could do something.
Not even moving a muscle to check her claim, they just looked at her and told her to stop wasting their time. Needless to say, my entire family lost faith in the entire police service. The case is open, but no one is bothering to look for him. Not even the disrict police officers. We constantly have to look over our shoulders. We can't go out with our cousins because of the obvious fear for all our lives as the police have let this maniac roam free.
If that kind of treatment is what the police mete out to family members of dead kidnap victims when they were given all the necessary information and even when the suspect landed literally on their doorstep...then I am not quite surprised to learn that this is how they handle all the other people they swore to protect and serve.
My empathies to you. I cannot say I understand, it has never happened to me. But I do know HOW I'd feel.
I hope that you do get justice, sooner rather than later.
I am so sorry to hear about this. You are not alone. Our thoughts are with you and your loved ones.
We're hoping that more people come out here and give us their stories. Ensure that your MP's are given the opportunity to hear these awful stories.
I'am afraid without NAMES dates places etc, I find some of these "Indo oppression" stories hard to believe, (Or black Cops doh care bout Indians never mind 30 % of the Police force is of Indian heritage) I've noticed this trend since the UNC was booted out of office, to promote this slant in reporting. Any one recall Faud Khan's "crying baby" story and his belief that TT POST employees were helping kidnappers to "kidnap" Indian ppl in the Guardian? (Khan claimed that a "black man and a Dougla man with an Afro woman was using a tape recording of a baby crying to lure Indian women into coming out of their houses in order to rape them)
PS "Angel" there are several WHITE UK born Cops now working in Trinidad's Police Force why not try and talk to one of them?
Even when people are given supportive evidence like names dates and place etc - they may not believe or accept a particular issue.
Evidence helps credibility. People can chose to accept or reject even the best evidence. This is underpinned in part by the phenomenon of cognitive dissonance.
A website like this is not the place for providing that kind of evidence or proof. A court of law is. However, it is sad that the above kinds of cases often do not get to our altars of justice. Sorry - I can't provide evidence for that here.
What we can say out here is that there is reason to believe such and such may be the case or that it is worthy of further investigation and action. Not because we can't see evidence of A, B and C means that we simply dismiss the existence of some matter that may rest on A, B and C.
Very few people have seen their spleens, livers or other internal organs but we don't go around saying to individuals: "Hey you don't have a gall-bladder because you can't provide evidence for it" - I think that kind of logic would seriously offend commonsense.
Our purpose out here is not to pass final judgements on credibility or prove cases beyond reasonble doubt. I think it is more productive to listen to the above kinds of stories and extract any consistency we might be able to find. And I'm not suggesting that consistency will necessarily bring us very much closer to the truth.
Nonetheless, we need to ask ourselves why do we pay any attention to any matter at all - especially the ones we can never access hard evidence about.