You are hereAnand's Collection / Look in the mirror
Look in the mirror
Can you imagine how different this country could have been today, if Basdeo Panday had managed his temper, swallowed his pride, and not defected from the NAR to form Club ’88? Political discretion was never the better part of Panday’s valour.
The year 1986 was Panday’s first real chance to change the course of our social and political history, and he failed to see the larger picture. He should have thought about how he could right the wrongs he quarrelled about as Leader of the Opposition, and formulate a strategy as to how he could bring about meaningful change by fighting from a position of power in government.
Instead, he opted to retreat to the predictable impotence of opposition, and condemned us to a lifetime of PNM incompetence. He chose personal power and fame over country and people. His political career is littered with fragmentation, destruction and re-creation. He lacked vision and patience. Today, we are paying the price for his selfish choices that predictably led to the re-election of the PNM. Even now, a shadow of his former self, Panday still thrives on the sound and fury of self-destruction and internecine warfare, and is opting for the path that will entrench the PNM.
The PNM has returned the favour by keeping Panday in politics, because his irrational behaviour is a bonus. The year 2009 would mark a decade since Panday allegedly made false declarations of his income and assets to the Integrity Commission. Panday’s retrial is virtually stuck in the mud, because yet another judicial review has been filed to challenge the refusal of Magistrate Espinet to disqualify herself from presiding over his trial, on the basis of her perceived links with the PNM.
Panday was lucky to have his previous conviction and sentence set aside, after it emerged that the Chief Magistrate had compromised himself and the integrity of the trial by failing to disclose his involvement in a land transaction that involved assistance from high-ranking members of the PNM.
There is a conspiracy theory that the PNM is doing its utmost best to keep Panday alive. He is the single largest obstacle to political unity of the opposition forces, and as long as he is politically alive and active, the PNM is safe.
Why/how did secret, confidential discussions between former AG John Jeremie and Chief Magistrate McNicolls leak out? Are we to believe that a political party with over 50 years’ experience, that has protected some of the most corrupt deals ever made, was so naive that it couldn’t keep the lid on the infamous land transaction? I doubt it.
Maybe McNicolls was set up and didn’t realise it. What if we all got it wrong from the start? There was never any intention to bribe McNicolls to ensure he convicted Panday. What if the plan was to muddy the waters of the trial to ensure that if Panday was convicted and sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of one year (thereby disqualifying him from holding political office under the constitution), he is given a lifeline by being able to challenge his conviction on the ground of bias?
What better gift could the PNM want than an opposition leader indelibly tainted with the brush of corruption with a re-trial hanging over his head? Keeping Panday in this state of limbo suits the PNM well.
His re-trial is set to proceed, and Magistrate Espinet refuses to step down, despite her links with a politically inspired charitable organisation founded by a PNM stalwart. It has now emerged that her father was a PNM minister. Had she simply stepped aside and allowed a different magistrate to do Panday’s case, he might have been convicted and removed from the political equation. But that could spell disaster for the PNM.
I’m not suggesting that Espinet is part of any political conspiracy, but a simple administrative transfer of a case, to avoid yet another series of judicial reviews that would delay (yet again) the start of Panday’s re-trial would have solved the problem and upheld the integrity of the administration of justice.
Panday personally administered lethal injections to the UNC government, by unnecessarily forcing internal elections that created enemies and division within his own camp along old fault lines. It started with his declaration, as PM, that he didn’t intend to stay on forever, and wanted the party to choose a successor.
Kamla, Ramesh and Carlos slugged it out, and Panday’s reputed blue-eyed boy, Carlos, lost to Ramesh. Dookeran was next in line, as Panday nominated him political leader, but ran a competing slate against him for control of the executive.
Many watch in horror as Panday continues to stab the UNC, even while it nurses yesterday’s self-inflicted wounds. He will boast that he was able to bury and resurrect many political enemies during his colourful career: Kelvin Ramnath, Ramesh Lawrence Maharaj, and Winston Dookeran, to mention a few.
One thing he will never be able to answer, though, is who was primarily responsible for keeping the PNM in power for over 40 years. To answer this, he must look in the mirror.
By Anand Ramlogan 2008-12-07
- Printer-friendly version
- 1273 reads
A wasted call. Panday blind, he can't see in the Mirror or anywhere else.
People have been writng letters like these for decades, what makes Anand think that Panday-monium will heed the call of this one?
The fault lies with the blind who choose not to see.
Mr Ramlogan,
Many a time I have read you article online on a Sunday morning and have been quite disturbed by what I read.I do not mean this in a negative way.In all the redundant tones that fill our dailes, yours, whilst being disturbing at times, is also refreshing.
It is refreshing because, like an autopsy, you lay bare in front open eyes what truly exists beyond the surface. Be it your view on the state of justice, health, education or politics, you've realised the nicities need not be adhered to when, at the very core, there is lots that is fundamentally wrong. To open a reader's eyes in such a manner, even at times with disturbing mental imges, is a necessity.
I enjoyed you latest addition in Freedom chambers... and hope you can continue the insightful journalism.
I'm absolutely baffled. [Words in bold are my emphasis below]
In Plotting Against Panday on 25th March 2007, Anand goes "Panday was not charged with corruption, and for those who know him he is virtually incorruptible. His personality and traits have no leaning towards materialism and ostentation, and his primary concern and love is politics . One point two million dollars could hardly be credited as a bribe paid to a PM who was in charge of a billion-dollar economy at a time when we were aggressively monetising our off-shore gas reserves by international competitive bidding."
For in that sea of impeccability is nested that, "...he opted to retreat to the predictable impotence of opposition, and condemned us to a lifetime of PNM incompetence. He chose personal power and fame over country and people. His political career is littered with fragmentation, destruction and re-creation. He lacked vision and patience. Today, we are paying the price for his selfish choices that predictably led to the re-election of the PNM. Even now, a shadow of his former self, Panday still thrives on the sound and fury of self-destruction and internecine warfare, and is opting for the path that will entrench the PNM."
Yes, the two contexts that attracted these remarks are different. However, they cut to the heart of Panday's being. How could a man with such enviable personal characteristics in 2007 be bent on fragmentation, destruction, selfishness, lacking vision and patience, and incompetence in late 2008? Oh - I could answer dat? "He means well - he jes cyah deliver!" Nahee! It doh fit. People who have no leaning towards materialism and ostentation are quite usually of greater moral and mental fibre than the negative characteristics I read of in the same person in 2008.
Anand has never brought resolution to this glaringly obvious disparity outlined above. And in March 2007 Anand said "..his rightful place as a true champion who struggled for the betterment of his people and country." I took could concoct a 'logic' to explain all this - I'm used to arguing over cuhraap (aka crap) in court. The core point is that here in Dec 2008, we now hear words to the effect from Anand that Panday whilst a champion struggler, actually did work for the betterment of his people and country! Well, is eidda I totally confused, Anand totally confused, or Panday is totally confused. Leh we blame Panday den - eh?. Daize dee easiest t'ing tuh do.
Anand's silence on this is deafening!!
It is amazing that Anand can make the kind of statements that he did in this article with a straight face. When Panday looks in the mirror, he will see the only man who beat the PNM not once but three times and that is why Panday is before the courts on trumped up charges.
Anand show me any other person who ever beat the PNM, and don't tell me Robinson because Robinson could never have seen the PM's chair, if it wasn't for Panday. Just like how, you and Dookeran will never see parliament without Panday.
As for Anand's musing that Panday should have hold his temper and not leave the NAR, that comment does not even belong in a serious conversation; Anand is still rubbing his rear end after being beaten by the "weakest candidate that the UNC had" (Anand's words).
Panday surrendered his power base to Robinson only to find himself marginalized, used and abused by the very people who Panday carried to power on his back. No leader worth his salt would sit back and allow that. If Panday had put his tail between his legs, like Dookeran and brown nose Robinson, Trinidad would never have had the opportunity to experience the best prime minister in its history.